/buzzincontent-1/media/media_files/2025/10/20/alishba-khalid-2025-10-20-12-58-14.jpeg)
Alishba Khalid
New Delhi: Malabar Gold & Diamonds ran into a Dhanteras backlash after its September collaboration with Pakistani influencer Alishba Khalid resurfaced online. Users pointed to her past post on Operation Sindoor and called for a boycott through the festive buying window.
The online heat spiked after the Bombay High Court, on October 18, directed X (formerly Twitter) to withhold activist Vijay Patel’s account in India and take down his posts on the tie-up. Malabar has filed a defamation suit against Patel. The order is interim and the matter is sub judice.
Through the weekend, #BoycottMalabarGold trended widely. Users shared videos and pictures that they said showed thin footfall at select outlets and urged shoppers to pick “homegrown” jewellers. BestMediaInfo could not independently verify store-traffic claims or sales impact.
Mullabar shamelessly earns profits from Hindus by selling gold, while giving iftar parties and scholarships only to Musl!ms 🤡.
— Cosmoshiv 🚩 (@TrinetraWrath) October 19, 2025
> I urge every H!ndu not to buy a single thing from them 🙏🏻
#BoycottMalabarGoldpic.twitter.com/LbGLvU5AT0
No need to buy from M. P. Ahammed owned Malabar Gold & Diamonds
— Tushar ॐ♫₹ (@Tushar_KN) October 18, 2025
They hired a Pakistani influencer who hates India to promote their products to Indian consumers
And when they were exposed, they attacked @vijaygajera#BoycottMalabarGoldpic.twitter.com/SZLPWMOUXY
Malabar has not issued a detailed statement on the boycott. Industry executives said the episode has triggered an internal review of influencer picks and festive marketing. The Kerala-headquartered chain operates more than 350 stores in India and overseas, and Dhanteras is among its peak sales days.
#BoycottMalabarGold worked, Look at their empty stores on Dhanteras. That’s the power of your outrage Hindus.
— Voice of Hindus (@Warlock_Shubh) October 18, 2025
Any company that supports or funds Pakistani terrorists will pay the price. Remember this. pic.twitter.com/yuoODoE35I
The legal move may offer near-term relief, but it does not settle the brand narrative. A court win can coexist with a consumer hit if the boycott storyline dominates the festive news cycle. Media planners said the risk is reputational as much as commercial: even if the company “wins” in court, the week can still be lost at the counter.
The row also underlines the rising scrutiny on cross-border collaborations. Brand safety checks now routinely include historic posts of partners and sentiment scans before high-stakes launches. Interim court orders that geo-restricting accounts or posts are not uncommon in defamation matters, but they rarely end the argument.
Dhanteras typically lifts the jewellery market, yet Malabar’s day was defined by a trending hashtag and a courtroom footnote. The fear inside the trade is simple: even if the company secures legal relief, the episode could leave it looking like it won on paper and lost with buyers when it mattered most.